Save
Are you paying someone to lose your money?
Advisers may advertise their past results, but their promises of high returns often aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on.
Are you paying someone to lose your money?
Advisers may advertise their past results, but their promises of high returns often aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on.
The fact that the financial industry is able, and required, to use disclosures such as ‘past results are no guarantee of future performance’ has always perplexed me.
On one hand, I understand the logic. It’s meant to alert a potential investor to the fact that the results achieved in a particular year or over a number of years may not continue. On the other hand, I question whether this disclosure protects an investor and helps them to make an informed decision or whether it’s simply used by the finance industry as a ‘get out of jail free’ card.
Say, you employ the services of an adviser who has achieved stellar results over the past five years, and the following year you discover that you’ve lost a significant amount of money using their services. When you call to find out why their performance has changed so dramatically, they provide you with the standard line, “Market conditions have changed and past performance doesn’t guarantee future returns”. How does that assist you in making a better decision?
We all know that market conditions change but isn’t that why you pay for a professional service? Aren’t you paying professionals to adjust to changing market conditions and to make money, or at the very least protect what’s been invested, irrespective of market conditions? To add insult to injury, you’re also likely being charged fees for the privilege of having your money managed and lost. One thing is for certain, it doesn’t do anything to improve the reputation of the industry as a whole or help investors to determine who to trust with their hard-earned money.
Imagine if you built a house using a reputable builder who had a long reputation of building quality houses. After a year, your house collapses. When you call them to complain they say, “Sorry, our past construction performance is no guarantee of the future quality of our work”. Would you accept this? Of course you wouldn’t. You would be taking them to court and suing them for damages and compensation. You paid a professional to build you a quality house and you should therefore get what you paid for. In the financial world, however, getting paid for poor advice and poor results is totally acceptable.
I believe this is one of the biggest faults in the financial industry and one that needs an immediate overhaul. The fact that a professional providing you financial advice can lose your money and still charge you a fee for the privilege is a sad reality. Anyone can lose money in the market, but paying for professional advice is supposed to prevent this from happening or at the very least minimise the probability of it happening. What consequences do financial advisors and fund managers face if they don’t make you money? Currently, the answer is very few, if any.
I’m not suggesting that all professional brokers, traders, subscription newsletters or anyone else that offers financial advice should always make you money. That’s unrealistic. I do believe, however, that you shouldn’t have to pay for poor performance.
If a professional can’t make you money, they shouldn’t demand a fee. This would have the additional benefit of ridding the industry of a large number of unqualified people who shouldn’t be providing financial advice in the first place. Ask yourself how long someone would continue to be employed if they weren’t making any money for their employer, either directly or indirectly. I suspect not long. This should be the same for the financial industry.
Luke Cummings, managing director, Harvest Lane Asset Management
Expenses
Expert tips to secure your financial safety net
New Zealanders are known for their "she'll be right" attitude, but when it comes to handling unexpected bills, being prepared is crucial. Read more
Expenses
Australians continue to opt for free VPNs, ignoring potential privacy risks
Australians, alongside citizens of Sweden, South Korea, and Mexico, are increasingly choosing to use free Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), despite the potential threats to their privacy. Read more
Expenses
Rooftop solar in childcare centres could cut energy bills by millions
The analysis conducted by Parents for Climate has revealed that the installation of rooftop solar and batteries in early childhood education and care (ECEC) centres could lead to savings of up to $130 ...Read more
Expenses
Corporate Traveller identifies key strategies for business travel savings
Flight Centre Travel Group's Corporate Traveller, a premier service provider for managing SME travel, has shared several effective strategies that enabled their business clients to significantly ...Read more
Expenses
Price no longer the prime factor for energy bills
Many Australians are intrigued but unconvinced when it comes to greening their energy bill. Read more
Expenses
1 in 2 Aussie pet owners spends on their pets more than themselves
Does owning a pet eat into your monthly budget? You’re not alone. Read more
Expenses
The real reason Sydney’s petrol prices are so high
Sydney fuel prices may seem like they’re soaring, but a recent study indicates that they may be cheaper than you think. Read more
Expenses
Morrison backs big pharma, turns back to developing countries
Big pharma is currently fighting to maintain intellectual property protections over COVID-19 vaccines, with Australia refusing to act despite having no pharmaceutical companies. Read more
Expenses
Expert tips to secure your financial safety net
New Zealanders are known for their "she'll be right" attitude, but when it comes to handling unexpected bills, being prepared is crucial. Read more
Expenses
Australians continue to opt for free VPNs, ignoring potential privacy risks
Australians, alongside citizens of Sweden, South Korea, and Mexico, are increasingly choosing to use free Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), despite the potential threats to their privacy. Read more
Expenses
Rooftop solar in childcare centres could cut energy bills by millions
The analysis conducted by Parents for Climate has revealed that the installation of rooftop solar and batteries in early childhood education and care (ECEC) centres could lead to savings of up to $130 ...Read more
Expenses
Corporate Traveller identifies key strategies for business travel savings
Flight Centre Travel Group's Corporate Traveller, a premier service provider for managing SME travel, has shared several effective strategies that enabled their business clients to significantly ...Read more
Expenses
Price no longer the prime factor for energy bills
Many Australians are intrigued but unconvinced when it comes to greening their energy bill. Read more
Expenses
1 in 2 Aussie pet owners spends on their pets more than themselves
Does owning a pet eat into your monthly budget? You’re not alone. Read more
Expenses
The real reason Sydney’s petrol prices are so high
Sydney fuel prices may seem like they’re soaring, but a recent study indicates that they may be cheaper than you think. Read more
Expenses
Morrison backs big pharma, turns back to developing countries
Big pharma is currently fighting to maintain intellectual property protections over COVID-19 vaccines, with Australia refusing to act despite having no pharmaceutical companies. Read more