Save
Taxpayer loses out to ATO in ‘awkward’ court case
A recent court case indicates the ATO may not be held to their communications if they were made in error, leaving taxpayers in an “awkward” position.
Taxpayer loses out to ATO in ‘awkward’ court case
A recent court case indicates the ATO may not be held to their communications if they were made in error, leaving taxpayers in an “awkward” position.
The High Court has refused a taxpayer’s application for special leave to appeal against the decision of a full bench of the Federal Court in Pintarich v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation.
The Federal Court’s ruling found that Mr Pintarich was liable for the entire amount of general interest charge (GIC) on income tax, despite an error in communication from a letter from the deputy commissioner stating that he was not.
The letter, issued under the signature block of the first deputy commissioner, purported to remit all GIC payable by the taxpayer except for a relatively small amount.
“Thank you for your promise to pay your outstanding account. We agree to accept a lump sum payment of $839,115.43 on or by 30 January 2015,” said the ATO. “This payout figure is inclusive of an estimated GIC amount calculated to 30 January 2015.”
Mr Pintarich then made the full payment by the due date but was later advised in a subsequent letter on 18 August 2015 that the amount paid did not include the entire amount of GIC accrued.
“We wish to advise you that the letter issued by the deputy commissioner of taxation dated 8 December 2014 titled ‘Payment Arrangement for your Income Tax Account Debt’ was issued in error. The outstanding amount of $839,115.43 in the letter did not include the entire amount of GIC, which had accrued on the entire amount of outstanding debt up to and including 8 December 2014,” the ATO letter said.
The court found that the error was made due to information input into a computer-based “template bulk issue letter” by an ATO officer, and that no decision had been made because there was no “mental process” of reaching a conclusion.
What does this mean for taxpayers?
The Tax Institute’s senior tax counsel, Professor Robert Deutsch, believes taxpayers will need to “tread carefully” with future offers of settlement, considering the number of automated letters issued by the ATO on a daily basis.
“My view is that the Tax Office should stick by their own unequivocal unambiguous offers of settlement and if it turns out that is an error, which clearly was the case here, they have to live by it,” said Professor Deutsch.
“In reverse, I’m hypothesising here, but if a taxpayer puts forward an unequivocal offer to pay an amount which the Tax Office then accepted, I’d be very surprised if the taxpayer was allowed to go back and say, ‘that was a mistake, my secretary sent that and I didn’t mean it’.”
RELATED ARTICLES
Tax saving
Navigating tax laws for capital gains in 2023
The landscape of Australian tax laws surrounding capital gains is ever-changing, with 2023 being no exception. Read more
Tax saving
What you need to know about the tax implications of crypto
One million Aussies are now invested in crypto, but many have not thought about how these investments will affect them at tax time. Read more
Tax saving
Welfare overhaul could give recipients a leg-up
Australia’s Centrelink recipients who’ve been doing it tough are in for a potentially easier time if the federal government pursues ambitious reforms that could provide sturdier safety nets. Read more
Tax saving
Students should think twice before tapping into their super
Former students might want to think carefully before they look to take advantage of the federal government’s biggest first home buyer incentive. Read more
Tax saving
Advocates call for an end to tax cuts
Social services sector advocates have warned that further tax cuts may make solving Australia’s biggest challenges much harder. Read more
Tax saving
ATO and AUSTRAC may gain new phone-tapping powers
A proposed update to electronic surveillance legislation could see the ATO armed with new powers that would allow the agency to bug phones and intercept online communications. Read more
Tax saving
Over 2m Aussies asked the TPB for help during the last year
As the economy recovers, Australia’s tax regulator says it’s planning to put unregistered practitioners under the microscope. Read more
Tax saving
Will you pay higher taxes due to bracket creep?
Bracket creep will see Australians paying more tax on average, unless further cuts are introduced in the future. Read more
Tax saving
Navigating tax laws for capital gains in 2023
The landscape of Australian tax laws surrounding capital gains is ever-changing, with 2023 being no exception. Read more
Tax saving
What you need to know about the tax implications of crypto
One million Aussies are now invested in crypto, but many have not thought about how these investments will affect them at tax time. Read more
Tax saving
Welfare overhaul could give recipients a leg-up
Australia’s Centrelink recipients who’ve been doing it tough are in for a potentially easier time if the federal government pursues ambitious reforms that could provide sturdier safety nets. Read more
Tax saving
Students should think twice before tapping into their super
Former students might want to think carefully before they look to take advantage of the federal government’s biggest first home buyer incentive. Read more
Tax saving
Advocates call for an end to tax cuts
Social services sector advocates have warned that further tax cuts may make solving Australia’s biggest challenges much harder. Read more
Tax saving
ATO and AUSTRAC may gain new phone-tapping powers
A proposed update to electronic surveillance legislation could see the ATO armed with new powers that would allow the agency to bug phones and intercept online communications. Read more
Tax saving
Over 2m Aussies asked the TPB for help during the last year
As the economy recovers, Australia’s tax regulator says it’s planning to put unregistered practitioners under the microscope. Read more
Tax saving
Will you pay higher taxes due to bracket creep?
Bracket creep will see Australians paying more tax on average, unless further cuts are introduced in the future. Read more
More articles
OUR PLATFORMS AND BRANDS
- Accountants Daily
- Accounting Times
- Adviser Innovation
- Australian Aviation
- Broker Daily
- Cyber Daily
- Defence Connect
- Fintech Business
- HR Leader
- Independent Financial Adviser
- Investment Centre
- Investor Daily
- Lawyers Weekly
- Money Management
- Nestegg
- Property Buzz
- Real Estate Business
- Smart Property Investment
- SMSF Adviser
- Space Connect
- Super Review
- The Adviser
- Wellness Daily
- World of Aviation
EVENTS AND SUMMITS
- Accountants Daily 30 Under 30 Awards
- Adviser Innovation Summit
- Australian Accounting Awards
- Australian Aviation Awards
- Australian Broking Awards
- Australian Defence Industry Awards
- Australian Law Awards
- Australian Space Awards
- Australian Space Summit
- Better Business Summit & Awards
- Broker Daily Business Awards
- Corporate Counsel Summit & Awards
- Cyber Security Summit & Awards
- Defence Connect Budget Lunch
- Defence Connect DSR Summit
- Fund Manager of the Year Awards
- ifa Excellence Awards
- ifa Future Forum
- Investor Daily ESG Summit
- Lawyers Weekly 30 Under 30 Awards
- Lawyers Weekly Women in Law Forum
- New Broker Academy
- Partner of the Year Awards
- REB Awards
- Reinnovate
- SME Broker Bootcamp
- SMSF Adviser Technical Day
- Super Fund of the Year Awards
- Women in Finance Awards
- Women in Law Awards
- Accountants Daily Podcast Network
- Australian Aviation Podcast Network
- Broker Daily Podcast Network
- Defence Connect Podcast Network
- HR Leader Podcast Network
- REB Podcast Network
- Relative Return
- Space Connect Podcast
- The Adviser Podcast Network
- The ifa Show
- The Lawyers Weekly Show
- The Smart Property Investment Show
PODCASTS
LEARNING AND EDUCATION
MOMENTUM MARKETS NETWORK
LINKS
STAY CONNECTED
Make your nest egg grow. Register now for nestegg updates.